Forums
Posted By: Excoriator Collapse of Crane - 3rd Jun 2019 8:34am
The second of the two cranes that used to be at the end of the disused oil jetty in Rock Ferry collapsed yesterday at about 5 PM. The first one went years ago. This second collapse seems to have damaged the remaining infrastructure of the rusting structure which will over the years follow it. The deck near the crane is now sagging dangerously.

The whole decaying structure is dangerous, and from time to time one sees kids playing on it. At least one young man died on it, and it should be demolished immediately in my opinion.
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 3rd Jun 2019 9:23am
Why they never chopped a section out I'll never understand, looking at it yesterday there was virtually no barbed wire blocking it off yet again, I could have climbed on very easily.

https://www.wikiwirral.co.uk/forums.../the-old-shore-crane-just-fell-down.html
Posted By: lansyp Re: Collapse of Crane - 4th Jun 2019 8:37am
i gather its owned by peel holdings or the oil terminal and would require either of them to spend money so it will be like that until they decide to build the proposed marina thats been on hold for 20 odd years .and they cant burn the thing down
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 4th Jun 2019 1:21pm
It is owned by Peel. There is some weird talk of refurbishing it, admittedly most if not all of the stanchions seem to be in fair condition but all the steel bed is beyond reclamation.
Posted By: Excoriator Re: Collapse of Crane - 4th Jun 2019 2:02pm
I don't believe it was ever part of Peel's holdings. It recently changed hands and is now owned by a consortium - members of the Royal Mersey Yacht club.

What use it is to anyone is baffling. Removing it will cost a fortune and it's well beyond being refurbished. Much of the steelwork is corroded through. The web in many of the girders (the vertical bit of the 'I' section) resembling lace in places or completely absent. As this supplies most of the girder's ability to bear loads, It is now unbelievably weak. You'd have to do some ultrasonic measurements of the steel thickness in the stanchions to establish how much metal has been lost to rust and how strong the remaining tube is.

The land where the tanks and buildings were originally has been partly cleared, but remains heavily polluted. There is still a large concrete cistern full of water with heavy crude oil sludge and tar floating on it.

It seems to me to be a liability not an asset, but who knows what a few hundred million might make of it?
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 4th Jun 2019 3:02pm
The new 1960 oil terminal was owned by the MDHB so I presume the old one was, if so it would have transferred to MDHC/Peel. Both terminals were in operation in the early 1970's.

I'm not sure if the RMYC took over the slipway, the pier or both, its all very unclear. To take over the pier is totally beyond credibility.
Posted By: AR_One Re: Collapse of Crane - 6th Jun 2019 11:57am
So does everything go up the pipeline now so all of that land could possibly be released if the pollution can be dealt with?
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 6th Jun 2019 4:55pm
The main tanks are still in use, its only the very small plot that was beside the pier and in front of the tea rooms that has been cleared. They need the tanks so they can pump the ships faster than the pipeline can handle. It may also be a strategic asset for storage.
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 7th Jun 2019 11:02am
Just found this thread. I've been fascinated by this crane for decades. I used to be able to see it out of my bedroom window when I was a small boy. I remember it used to be a sky blue colour in the 80's. One time in the 90's the gates had been opened and there was absolutely nothing stopping anyone walking to the crane, so I did and wish I would have taken a camera.

There was a building next to the refreshment rooms with what looked like laboratories and offices, a big warehouse with a furnace with 'Caution Asbestos' printed on it. Then three tanks with a swinging arm I assume was used to pump oil into trucks. Back then the jetty seemed in good condition with no planks missing. There was a crane arm behind the main crane and a wooden/metal gangway for boarding ships. Rumour had it that it closed because it got hit by lightning and a drunken captain crashed into the pier, though there was no visible damage, though the cab of the crane was missing.

The history of this place still interests me, though I've never been able to find anything about it on the internet. If anyone has any information on this place I'd love to know.
Posted By: pacef8 Re: Collapse of Crane - 7th Jun 2019 4:12pm
Mersey mammoth was there this morning about 7am.
Posted By: Excoriator Re: Collapse of Crane - 8th Jun 2019 4:09pm
The function of the Tranmere oil terminal is to allow large tankers - too big to get to the oil dock in Ellesmere port or the wharf in Stanlow to be discharged there.

As I understand it, the pier was nothing to do with the oil terminal which is still in use. It was originally built with a floating ramp to allow large ferries to be used when traffic got too heavy for the stone slipway to be used. It was later modified for use as a tanker cleaning berth. Being next to the oil terminal was obviously a good spec. If memory serves it was owned by Vesta industries and operated until a tanker demolished a large part of it. I don't think it worked after that. But if it did it wasn't for long. I don't think Peel ever got their hands on it, nor of course the oil terminal which went from Shell to Essar

Since Vesta left, the pier and the land where the tanks used to be were owned by a succession of people, none of whom did anything with it until the last one conveyed the tanks and pipework to the local scrap dealer. Although he cleared most of the land it remains horribly polluted and there is a large concrete cistern still there full of watery sludge and filth.

I am given to understand a consortium are currently in the process of buying pier and land. They all happen to be members of the RMYC but it is otherwise nothing to do with the club.It doesn't cover the stone slipway which I doubt is owned by anyone. The RMYC use it and the Tranmere sailing club, but neither have any ownership rights to it.

It's hard to see how anyone could do much with the pier or the land. I've seen a variety of wacco schemes for a hotel at the end of the pier, a marina, and luxury flats, but none of them seem to be more than some developers dream. None have been built.

I would imagine it might be best used as a car part for the Refreshment rooms. This is now a very popular eating place and the roads nearby are often choked with parked cars. Whether this is what is in the consortium's mind, I have no idea.

Ownership of the stone slipway remains a mystery. As the queen owns all the land between high and low water I wouldn't be surprised if it's hers. She's not been seen down there with a bucket of concrete and a trowel pointing it anyway. It is not in a very good state of repair although the RMYC do a bit of patching from time to time.
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 8th Jun 2019 6:32pm
Thanks for all that @Ex, I'm still trying to fit everything together.

All of Stanlow's crude oil comes in through Tranmere and is about nine million tonnes from 140 ships per year. Eastham apparently only deals with refined products which perhaps explains why the oil/petrol smells are so high there when ships are transferring.

Tranmere is the main crude storage location for Stanlow.

Rock Ferry ferry closed in 1939

Tranmere Oil Terminal opened in 1960 BUT I remember the existing terminal being built after this, or was it rebuilt, or was it made into two terminals at a later date?

When was the Tranmere/Stanlow pipeline built? It would have made sense if it was built with the various other pipelines during WW2.

Was rock ferry pier hit by a ship? I thought that but can't find any record of it and the pier has no bit missing compared to the early 1970s. Egremont, New Brighton and New Ferry were all clobbered and I'm wondering if New Ferry and Rock Ferry were mixed up?
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 9th Jun 2019 9:01am
From what I gather, the terminal with the jetty and Tranmere oil terminal appear to be two completely seperate entities.

It's interesting that you say have people been confusing the new ferry and rock ferry terminal because whilst trying to research this facility I have come across pictures of both of the new ferry and rock ferry slip ways and I've seen the new ferry one completely collapsed in photograph. However, if you look at the rock ferry one. It's the exact same jetty that still stands today. Albeit, the platform the crane was on all the way back to the 45 degree turn has all been added but the straight run from the shore out is the original pier. Take a look at old photographs and you can see and if you look at the current legs on the pier they have 2 different types of legs.
Posted By: Excoriator Re: Collapse of Crane - 9th Jun 2019 9:09am
I believe some work was done locally on developing the PLUTO pipeline (WW2). You can see bits of it at very low water just off the corner of the reclaimed land (Now the River Park)

Also I think there are two pipelines from Tranmere to Stanlow. I've no idea when the first smaller one was installed, but the second bigger one (24" I think) was laid in the late 1960s early 1970s as far as I can make out. I suspect the smaller one is now disused.

I have an idea that at one point, Stanlow got its crude oil from a mooring point off the North Wales Coast. They used a moored tanker for storage, arriving ones discharged into that and it was subsequently pumped from there across land to Stanlow. I can't recall who told me this, but it seems to have been abandoned now. It strikes me as rather a risky and expensive operation anyway.
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 9th Jun 2019 9:28am
There are signs down the beach at rock ferry saying something like caution submerged pipeline. Which has a shell logo on them. I noticed these about 10 years ago, I'm guessing some refurbishment work was carried out about then as the signs looked new.

With regard to the original terminal with the collapsed crane, I'm sure I have seen the words 'velor' or 'valor' gas somewhere on the original buildings.
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 9th Jun 2019 11:07am
Sorry for the double post. I've seemed to have a little luck researching the site. Rock Ferry Tanker Cleaning Berth and Vesta Oil, Rock Ferry seem to be good search terms.
Posted By: Moonstar Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 9:32am
Peel Ports, Notice to Mariners 2902019

https://www.peelports.com/media/449...sed-rock-ferry-tanker-cleaning-jetty.pdf
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 11:01am
Originally Posted by Moonstar


Good spot thumbsup
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 12:24pm
Interesting read. I had come to the conclusion that crane had collapsed vertically and damaged the Jetty, but from looking on the pictures on here and this report I would guess the left hand/east side of the Jetty may have collapsed and took the crane with it? What's you guys opinions?
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 4:27pm
I couldn't see any sign of the riverside section of the pier so I'd agree it appears that side of the pier collapsed dropping the crane in the process. What is amazing is that both ends of the I-girder and bed have totally let go, normally something is left hanging.

Attached picture P1320675-s.jpg
Posted By: colley614 Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 6:39pm
I can't seem to be able to attach the photograph I took but it looks like the riverside I beam is still attached at one end. The one shoreside looks bowed, like that side bowed first dropping the crane sideways which took the other I beam out. The thing that gets me is the rails for the crane appeared to be mounted to the structure independently to everything else.
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 11th Jun 2019 9:47pm
Originally Posted by colley614
I can't seem to be able to attach the photograph I took but it looks like the riverside I beam is still attached at one end. The one shoreside looks bowed, like that side bowed first dropping the crane sideways which took the other I beam out. The thing that gets me is the rails for the crane appeared to be mounted to the structure independently to everything else.


Yes, you are right.

Attached picture P1320666-s.jpg
Posted By: diggingdeeper Re: Collapse of Crane - 27th Sep 2023 12:17pm
A view of all three modern piers in operation at Tranmere Oil Terminal in 1962

https://historicengland.org.uk/imag...erial-photos/record/RAF_58_5162_F22_0267
© Wirral-Wikiwirral