Forums65
Topics76,422
Posts1,033,694
Members14,733
|
Most Online21,357 Oct 2nd, 2024
|
|
9 members (2 invisible),
12,996
guests, and
490
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
Wonder whether #piggate was a deliberate attempt to hide the 'real story' of the day. Being this...
Abolishment of free school meals and tax credits to the hardworking families that the Baconconservatives claim to support. The supplements that 'hard working' families need to exist.
I suggest that Cameron's vision of Hardworking families' does nor extend to blue collared workers with multi zero contracts, juggling child care costs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
....Or (off topic) the Tories just want shut of him as P.M- massive clue- #piggate originating from The Fail? Even The S*n followed suit today.
Maybe looking for a new, stronger leader to oppose Jeremy Corbyn #self-cervatives.
#Piggate ain't going away....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67 |
It really is quite simple. If you can't afford to have children and raise them until they are self sufficient then you should not be having them.
You're just making the problem worse i.e. have a kid, expect the state to look after them and then guess what, your kids have kids and expect the same.
Maybe introduce a 'license' to have kids? Think about it, the world would be a much better place and people who pop kids out for the hell of it would all of a sudden think twice about it - especially if it's going to impact on their (limited) cashflow.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,452
Forum Addict
|
Forum Addict
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,452 |
It really is quite simple. If you can't afford to have children and raise them until they are self sufficient then you should not be having them.
You're just making the problem worse i.e. have a kid, expect the state to look after them and then guess what, your kids have kids and expect the same.
Maybe introduce a 'license' to have kids? Think about it, the world would be a much better place and people who pop kids out for the hell of it would all of a sudden think twice about it - especially if it's going to impact on their (limited) cashflow. That was what I meant really. Well said Slinky. Socialists of course have no issue whatsoever with people who expect others to pay for things that they believe they are "entitled" to.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,098
Wiki Addict
|
Wiki Addict
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7,098 |
Most of the majority of school kids hate the school meals anyway. The packed lunch is the best solution,as long as its healthy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 14,434 Likes: 25
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 14,434 Likes: 25 |
We need to be promoting people to have children, many countries are averaging less than one child per person which means eventually the native population will either disappear or become a minority.
South Korea has a major problem with this, at one time the birth rate was far too large, the government took a number of measures to decrease the birth rate, unfortunately it has gone far too far, unless the birthrate picks up they will be extinct by 2750.
The UK still has too low a birthrate at 1.91 per woman, it needs to be 2 or above to sustain the population.
We don't do charity in Germany, we pay taxes. Charity is a failure of governments' responsibilities - Henning Wehn https://ddue.uk
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 820
Wise One
|
OP
Wise One
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 820 |
ive not once said my kids are entitled to free school meals as a given but my point is look after your own country before looking after others.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67 |
We need to be selective over who we allow to breed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,129
Forum Addict
|
Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,129 |
We need to be selective over who we allow to breed. Positive and negative eugenics, the last person to try this was that funny little chap with the strange moustache, Adolf someone or other, and that didn't turn out too well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,213
Forum Veteran
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,213 |
We need to be selective over who we allow to breed. I'm lost for words over that suggestion!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,803 Likes: 3
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,803 Likes: 3 |
We need to be selective over who we allow to breed. Translated, I think this means 'let's get everyone wound up' but I assume Slinky won't be on the breeding programme, for obvious reasons !!!
Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound together. All things connect. ~Chief Seattle
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,291 Likes: 3
Forum Master
|
Forum Master
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,291 Likes: 3 |
Positive and negative eugenics, the last person to try this was that funny little chap with the strange moustache, Adolf someone or other, and that didn't turn out too well. The USA was guilty of this too, well into the 1970s. http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/ Time magazine reports this was still happening as late as 2010 in some prisons: http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/10/eugenics-are-alive-and-well-in-the-united-states/
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 67 |
.
Last edited by Mark; 25th Sep 2015 8:56pm. Reason: Content Removed Not in the wiki spirit
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 2,291
Joined: December 2010
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|