Forums65
Topics76,462
Posts1,033,937
Members14,837
|
Most Online80,173 07:44 AM
|
|
9 members (2 invisible),
70,076
guests, and
1,475
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 209
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 209 |
The biggest problem with this contract was that it was signed according to Italian law & not English law. There were no stage payments as the work proceeded & Lairds had borrowed £40m from a bank to finance this. The lack of progress & workmanship issues were just a bluff, the real issue being that Costa had just been taken over by Carnival, who had decided that due to a downturn in the cruise business they didn't need the ship to be lengthened. Although the work was slightly behind, this would not have affected the section's insertion into the ship. Had this contract been under English law Costa would have lost the case.
Bob.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 89 |
I remember being sent to photograph the arrival of the Costa Classico into the Mersey & into Lairds for the local papers. I was purched atop of the Birkenhead Priory with a great vantage point for hours until I got the message that it wasn't coming!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 760
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 760 |
Costa had just been taken over by Carnival, who had decided that due to a downturn in the cruise business they didn't need the ship to be lengthened.
Bob. They just commissioned the Costa Europa (and her sister) instead!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249 |
I do a lot of work for Lairds. The workmanship must be up to scratch...Think about it, HOW many warships and vessels has Lairds built?? Must be doing something right. even now they have the contract for the RFA vessels (Royal Fleet Auxillary). I think the Italians just got cold feet and backed out AS USUAL!!!Easier to run away from things as their history proves! This contract was a pisstake as i see it. That what I thought regards to high workmanship because as you say they have been building ships for decades. Also the people who used to work at Laird still demanded a high standard on their vehicles when I used to repair them so I very much doubt it was shoddy workmanship and believe they were sold out. PB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 249 |
The biggest problem with this contract was that it was signed according to Italian law & not English law. There were no stage payments as the work proceeded & Lairds had borrowed £40m from a bank to finance this. The lack of progress & workmanship issues were just a bluff, the real issue being that Costa had just been taken over by Carnival, who had decided that due to a downturn in the cruise business they didn't need the ship to be lengthened. Although the work was slightly behind, this would not have affected the section's insertion into the ship. Had this contract been under English law Costa would have lost the case.
Bob. Perhaps they should have insisted is was set-up in British law but Lairds were desperate for work at that time and not forgetting thatcher off course who also stuck the knife in. It was very sad time indeed. PB
Last edited by paintboffin; 21st Jan 2012 6:42pm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,444
Forum Veteran
|
OP
Forum Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,444 |
Brilliant info fellahs, very informative and I found all the input spot on, good old wiki. For info, I served on a Lairds built sub, the Aeneas, in the 60's, it was built in 1947 and it was a brilliant boat. It was one of the last A boats scrapped and at one time was refitted to do trials with sub launched missiles. Cammell Lairds workmanship was, and probably still is, second to none. The Eyeties pulled a fast one: or should that be the Yanks?
Birkenhead........ God's own Room 101.
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 14,479
Joined: July 2008
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|