Forums65
Topics76,459
Posts1,033,924
Members14,835
|
Most Online44,182 Mar 18th, 2025
|
|
13 members (Alanbentley, 2 invisible),
8,597
guests, and
506
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868
Forum Veteran
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868 |
There you go again questioning the party line!!!
Carpe diem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868
Forum Veteran
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,868 |
Ah, anotber law firm cashing in.
Carpe diem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
I don't see why everyone is getting up in arms about this; it's only bringing tenants of public housing into line with private tenants who are on housing benefit. What did you make of Rottyladys' recent post Chriskay?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
(other than the kerching for Human Rights Solicitors)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176 |
DWP: bedroom tax will not be changed Last week the works and pensions secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, asked officials at the department to "look again" at the how the policy will affect disabled people IDS was prompted into the move after the chief executives of seven charities wrote an open letter to himself and Chancellor George Osborne outlining their concerns about the impact the bedroom tax would have on disabled people and family members who may be caring for them. However, the DWP has now announced that there will be U-turns on the plan http://www.24dash.com/news/central_government/2013-02-25-DWP-bedroom-tax-will-not-be-changed
Last edited by rottylady; 26th Feb 2013 10:39am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 475
Smartchild
|
Smartchild
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 475 |
DWP: bedroom tax will not be changed Last week the works and pensions secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, asked officials at the department to "look again" at the how the policy will affect disabled people IDS was prompted into the move after the chief executives of seven charities wrote an open letter to himself and Chancellor George Osborne outlining their concerns about the impact the bedroom tax would have on disabled people and family members who may be caring for them. However, the DWP has now announced that there will be U-turns on the plan http://www.24dash.com/news/central_government/2013-02-25-DWP-bedroom-tax-will-not-be-changed Thanks for keeping us updated. This now is beginning to make sense.thought it was a bit unfair if they hit pensioners and disabled tenants. Adults who have kids do need bigger houses as there is a big shortage of them. Cant see the point why poeple need 2 or three bedrooms laying empty and not being used,not unless its for the cat or dog haha.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,390
Forum Addict
|
Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,390 |
More odd information: http://www.tameside.gov.uk/planning/dwellings/standardsSee Part C, under "Housing Acts", although I believe this refers to houses of multiple occupancy, and not family homes... Part D goes on to say that new builds have no such limits imposed relating to room size... It does also say in section B just above that the Building Regs do not specify minimum room sizes. The sizes are for rental properties.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176 |
Candyfloss there seems to be a discreptionary with part of the article I posted earlier, after I read your comment I went back to the link to re-read it beginning of article states
There will be no changes made to the bedroom tax, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has said.
Then at end of article it states However, * the DWP has now announced that there will be U-turns on the plan.* A DWP spokesperson said: "**There is no change to our policy on under-occupancy. We will of course be monitoring this important reform closely as it is implemented in April and will ensure that the £155m in discretionary housing payments are being used appropriately** I AM CONFUSED NOW
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 176 |
according to the housing act 1985 section 326 The 1985 Housing Act section 326 (see here) says: - TABLE II Floor area of room Number of persons 110 sq. ft. or more = 2 persons 90 sq. ft. or more but less than 110 sq. ft. = 1.5 persons 70 sq. ft. or more but less than 90 sq. ft. = 1 person 50 sq. ft. or more but less than 70 sq. ft. = 0.5 a person Joe halewood states on his blog """One of the counter arguments to my view has been said there is no statutory notion of a percentage room and so this is all semantics. The above section 326 of the 1985 Housing Act disproves that as it says a room 50 – 69 square feet is for 0.5 of a person. 0.5 is a percentage not that there is half a person in any lay semblance of that term of course. So if the 2.9 bed house is in fact and can only be a 2.5 bed house as 0.5 is the ONLY percentage allowable in statute (which I don’t accept) then my point about the bedroom tax only being applicable where it is under occupied by one – that is 1.0 - bedroom, and not one ‘room’ - which is precisely what the A4/2012 says – means that the tenant is NOT subject to the bedroom tax""" http://speye.wordpress.com/2013/02/...isited-reclassifications-mutual-benefit/
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446
Wiki Master
|
Wiki Master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,446 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 475
Smartchild
|
Smartchild
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 475 |
Candyfloss there seems to be a discreptionary with part of the article I posted earlier, after I read your comment I went back to the link to re-read it beginning of article states
There will be no changes made to the bedroom tax, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has said.
Then at end of article it states However, * the DWP has now announced that there will be U-turns on the plan.* A DWP spokesperson said: "**There is no change to our policy on under-occupancy. We will of course be monitoring this important reform closely as it is implemented in April and will ensure that the £155m in discretionary housing payments are being used appropriately** I AM CONFUSED NOW Okay thanks for all the info you have shared with us.Maybe we got our wires crossed somehow. Keep us updated if anything new. This year will affect everyone with job losses etc.The council are already planning to pay staff off this year.More on the dole.
|
|
|
Click to View Topic.
|
|
Posts: 1,318
Joined: May 2011
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|